Emanuele Severino Turning to Emanuele Severino [1], to whom we acknowledge the merit of insisting on the eternal, immutable, and necessary nature, defending the principle of non-contradiction, and combating nihilism, it must be said that he falls into some serious errors. Firstly, he idealistically identifies thought with being; secondly, he denies the existence of temporal, mobile, and contingent beings, distinct from and outside of eternal being; thirdly, he rejects the analogy of being because he does not admit the degrees of being; fourthly, he judges the doctrine of creation as nihilistic because it refers to nothingness (
Part Ten - Atheism and Salvation
Part Ten - Atheism and Salvation
Part Ten - Atheism and Salvation
Emanuele Severino Turning to Emanuele Severino [1], to whom we acknowledge the merit of insisting on the eternal, immutable, and necessary nature, defending the principle of non-contradiction, and combating nihilism, it must be said that he falls into some serious errors. Firstly, he idealistically identifies thought with being; secondly, he denies the existence of temporal, mobile, and contingent beings, distinct from and outside of eternal being; thirdly, he rejects the analogy of being because he does not admit the degrees of being; fourthly, he judges the doctrine of creation as nihilistic because it refers to nothingness (